Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Creation v. Evolution

As a thinking human, I cannot arbitrarily reject the theory of evolution.  Obviously, we have evolved over the uncounted (pre-calendar) "years" since we "came out of the sea." However, even if our origin as a species did originate in the empty wet nothingness, that very "sea" had to have had a source for its existence.

Even if I were to accept the "big bang" theory, I would still have to pose the question; "what caused all that banging" and how did that intense heat lead to mankind, as we know it.? Since, in the physical universe, something (some thing) developing out of nothing (no thing) is, virtually, impossible, I, again, have to ask myself "how did we get here"?

The only way that any of this makes sense is by combining the theory of evolution WITH creation (Genesis) and, thereby, acheiving a human perspective of the unfathonable nature of G-D, the Creator.  If either theory (big bang or ocean) is at all valid, there had to have been a primary source that brought it about.  Even if the Bible is alagory, it is to teach us the true nature of reality.

Even the most determined physicists, after years of trying to disprove the existence of G-D, have concluded, without question, that the physical universe (something) is based on a non-physical universe (nothing).  Sub-atomic particles appear both as something (material) and nothing (spiritual).  This field of particles are, at times, visible and invisible...yet, even, in their invisible state, they are very "real".  Scientists named their findings "infinity".  Those of us who never required such "proof" just perfer to call "IT" G-D!

The choice of terminology is yours............the reality is "His".

No comments:

Post a Comment